Tuesday, November 24, 2020
  • SPORTS
  • VIDEOS
  • LIVE TV
More
    SPORTS Former players slam ICC for World Cup boundary-count rule: ‘Why not count...

    Former players slam ICC for World Cup boundary-count rule: ‘Why not count most wickets?’

    The final, and also the ensuing Super over, ended in a tie in the ICC World Cup final.

    New Delhi: Former cricketers, including India’s Gautam Gambhir, came down heavily on the International Cricket Council (ICC) for its “ridiculous” rule on boundary count that decided the World Cup title in England’s favour, and denied New Zealand a win after a pulsating final.

    In a thrilling encounter on July 14, England were adjudged the winners of the World Cup on the basis of their superior boundary count — 22 fours and two sixes — to New Zealand’s 16 after the Super Over too ended in a tie.

    “Don’t understand how the game of such proportions, the #CWC19Final, is finally decided on who scored the most boundaries. A ridiculous rule @ICC. Should have been a tie. I want to congratulate both @BLACKCAPS & @englandcricket on playing out a nail biting Final,” Gambhir wrote on his Twitter handle.

    Gambhir’s former teammate Yuvraj Singh also disagreed with the ICC rule of deciding the World Cup winner on boundary count.

    “I don’t agree with that rule ! But rules are rules congratulations to England on finally winning the World Cup, my heart goes out for the kiwis they fought till the end. Great game an epic final!!!! #CWC19Final,” he wrote.

    Former New Zealand all-rounder Scott Styris called ICC a joke.

    “Nice work @ICC … you are a joke!!!,” he wrote.

    Former Australian batsman Dean Jones also described the ICC rule as unfair.

    “The DL system is actually based on runs and wickets lost… yet the Final result is only based on Boundaries hit? Not fair in my opinion. Must have been great to watch!” he wrote.

    Opting to bat, New Zealand had put up a modest 241 for eight. In reply, England ended at the same score leading to the one-over eliminator.

    In the Super Over, England batted first and the duo of Ben Stokes, who kept the hosts in the game with a brilliant 84 off 98 balls, and Jos Buttler made 15, and New Zealand also ended at the same score but for the loss of one wicket, paving the way for an English victory on boundary count.

    Former New Zealand cricketers were also left hugely disappointed by the ICC’s rule, describing it as “absurd” and “unfortunate”.

    Former Black Caps all-rounder Dion Nash said he felt cheated after the finals.

    “I feel really empty, and a bit cheated,” he was quoted as saying in stuff.co.nz. Nash, however, said there was no point complaining as the rules were laid down much before the tournament.

    “You can’t complain, it was done at the start of the tournament. But I think that’s probably indicative of where the game’s mindset is at. Why not credit the guys who took the most wickets? The real measure that was used for generations was least amount of wickets lost. So why have we changed that?”

    Also Read: England win maiden ICC World Cup via dramatic Super Over against New Zealand

    Also Watch: BJP MLA’s Daughter Says Father Is Out To Kill Her After She Married Dalit Boy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mZfxsVrCHI

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    LATEST

    NEXT STORY